File #: 23-129    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Informational Report Status: Passed
File created: 1/25/2023 In control: County Administrative Office
On agenda: 2/7/2023 Final action: 2/7/2023
Title: Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) Workgroup Recommendations Regarding Funding Related to Measure J
Attachments: 1. Staff Report, 2. Resolution 22-40.pdf, 3. Funding Priorities in Survey.pdf, 4. Art and Culture_BOS Materials_TOT.pdf, 5. Public Safety proposal.pdf, 6. Film - Forest Moon Days One-Sheet Feb 2023.pdf, 7. Film - Redwood Region Soundstage Studio Feb 2023.pdf, 8. Tourism Details.pdf, 9. Public Comment.pdf
Previous Action/Referral: 23-665, 23-830, 23-1346, 23-160, 24-387

To: Board of Supervisors

From: County Administrative Office

Agenda Section: Departmental

Vote Requirement: Majority

SUBJECT:
title
Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) Workgroup Recommendations Regarding Funding Related to Measure J
end

RECOMMENDATION(S):
Recommendation
That the Board of Supervisors:
1. Determine the levels of Measure J funding to allocate to the agencies referenced in this report through Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25;
2. Direct staff to return with a supplemental budget, as needed, to implement the Board's direction;
3. Authorize the County Administrative Office to enter into agreements and amendments necessary to implement the Board's direction, after review from Risk Management and County Counsel; and
4. Take other action as appropriate.

Body
SOURCE OF FUNDING:
Hotel & Motel Tax (107010)

DISCUSSION:
Prior to voter approval, last year, of Measure J, which increased the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) from 10% to 12% in the unincorporated areas of the county, and added RV parks and private campgrounds, your Board created a TOT workgroup and tasked the group to create recommendations for expenditures from revenues related to the measure, if it were to pass. Since then, the TOT workgroup met on three occasions and identified priority projects from each agency represented, and various levels of funding needed for those projects.

Rather than provide one specific recommendation, the group recommended providing to your Board several proposals, each with an emphasis on a different service. The services addressed in each proposal reflect the priorities identified when likely voters were polled (Attachment 1) and the ballot language (Attachment 2) for this measure. Those services are as follows: housing, arts, tourism, film, and public safety.

As shown below and in the included attachments, there will not be enough revenue to fully fund all of the projects submitted. Therefore, the recommendation before your Board today is to determine which ...

Click here for full text